Velikost videa: 1280 X 720853 X 480640 X 360
Zobrazit ovladače přehrávání
Want to help support this channel? Consider subscribing on Patreon: www.patreon.com/TheCriticalDrinker
HOW DID "GIGANTOR" GET TO THE 2 "SECURITY" .......WITH ANOTHER SITTING AT THE BAR N MUST BE AS BLIND AS A BAT..🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Robert Patterson is doing way better more in movies like the lighthouse and his upcoming film Christopher nolan's Tenet.
Would you consider setting up on SubscribeStar or some other alternative to Patreon. I'd like to support you, but I can't use Patreon after their bullshit antics.
@Space Roamer I don't get it.
@Bruno Fernandez you have no point, you're complacent
gotta be honest, only reason i watched Charlie's Angels (2000) was because Tom Green was in it, and he played a character named Chad..... that's also all i kinda remember from that movie, Chad on a boat and CHAD IS GREAT XD chclip.net/video/jnVMzmbvtfI/video.html
It was not helped by the fact that NONE of the women were attractive. Sorry, I am a flaming heterosexual and the last brace of Charlie's Angels movies had sexy women leads, ditto the old TV series. It is not a good sign when the Audi sports car was the sexiest thing or person to show up in the movie. And would the studios please stop trying to make Kristen Stewart the "next big thing". Just stop. It is not going to happen. Ditto Cara Delavigne.
"Sir" Patrick Stewart likes to talk all kinds of shit about how he will only do ST Picard under certain conditions - because integrity and shit.Yeah, and THIS movie? He's a Hollywood whore just like all the rest. And I won't watch that dumpster fire either.
None of them are very attractive either......not by hollyweird standards
How bad did this movie tank? I didn't even know it existed till I saw this video.
Charlie is dead now is called the LGBTQ’s Angels
this guy sounds like he shittin a sharp rough piece of shit and he really cannot handle it
It pains me to see Naomi Scott in this. I feel like she actually is a decently talented actress that just can't get her lucky break.
Ms Banks wanted to make a feminist statement about female empowerment, so she made a film that glorifies violence and good old-fashioned feminine glamour. I could take her pretensions more seriously if her Angels were ordinary - looking (ie non-glamorous) middle-aged or elderly women who defeated the baddies by no-violent means, rather than by shooting them and bashing them and throwing them about. That'd make them much healthier role-models.
Unpopular opinion, both the filmmakers and the people criticising this film are snowflakes
Elizabeth Banks, Cue the Troy McClure voice saying "You may remember me from such films as Zack & Miri make a porno...." Lol Fucking clown
I thought reboots were supposed to include a gender change of the main characters? I won't even watch this when it finally arrives to free to air tv in 10yrs.....I learnt my lesson with the Ghostbusters reboot.Sorry, I only lasted to the 3min mark on your video and had to turn it off
Kristen stewart could make a good ciri
When you mentioned the gender and ethnicity of the men in the movie ... you left out Smug Businessman. Just sayin'. :)
They don't care about money. They have plenty. The point is destroying men.
Bless you, Sir, for enduring this for us!
I'm old enough to have grown up with the original show. I had zero interest in the previous remake (HOLY COW, THAT WAS 20 YRS AGO?1), let alone this one. I barely heard / knew anything about it!I've watched a few eps of the old show lately and was reliving my childhood, while trying to view it through adult eyes. Sure, it was ridiculous. Even as a kid, I was never fully convinced they were detectives. But who cares? The girls were so beautiful that it was enough to just see them running around pretending to catch criminals. (And I say this as a straighter-than-straight woman.)While they weren't the best actresses on the planet, I enjoyed their friendships with each other & with Bosley. There was a silly charm to it all. Most of all, it was fun! Remember that, Hollywood? FUN?
Yes we all know the huge list of female scientific accomplishments compared to Male scientific accomplishments.
Why has sir patrick stewart got involved in this cluster fuck?
I enjoyed battlefield earth.
Many of your critiques of woke filmmaking are valid. I agree with many of them. But I dont know why everybody is so mad at lady ghostbusters. it wasnt perfect but what was wrong with it didnt have anything to do what everyone is so pissed off about. The handsome man being really dumb trope has been around for at least a century. The fact that it is women characters suffering his stupidity is perfectly fine. Just like it's OK for women characters to suffer the dumb blonde trope. Makes you all look intolerant.
you know the movie is bad when after 1/3 video, pausing it to comment and close it.
Leave it to a feminist to produce a dumpster fire.She could shake hands with Kathleen Kennedy.
It really is very, very bad, in every way possible.
"The movie finally stumbled out the gate" LMAO
the greatest problem with modern holywood film is the desesperate feeling of insert a joke of any line of the movie.
Roflol, holy crap, you're brutal.
I fancied Jacqueline Smith in the original.
In my opinion, Jaclyn Smith in her heyday was one of the most beautiful women I've ever seen.
No no.....let Hollywood go ahead and continue making movie like this. Fucking idiots. Let's them go right ahead and kill themselves. Tired of Hollywood.
Is the scientist played by Abella Danger?
I wonder how long it took them to decide on that tramp stamp tattoo they all have
Hahaha , thanks .. I was not going to go see it anyway but how more dumb will 2020 movies get ?
Let’s think about this for a second: Elizabeth Banks claims that the movie bombed because men didn’t come out and see it. Therefore, if men HAD come out and seen it, the box office would go somewhere from 8 million to 16 million (assuming a generously equal split of male and female viewers). In this case, the movie is still a huge financial failure. So, her only other excuse would be that men discouraged women from seeing it altogether, tanking the numbers. But if this is her excuse, she is assuming women are so helpless and unempowered that they don’t have the free will to go see a movie they are interested in (not very progressive of her, is it?). Any way you slice it, her excuses are shit.
I can't believe Patrick Stewart agreed to be in this piece of shit.
This was so much better :Dchclip.net/video/NKpcmdBcLjk/video.html
After the movie burned at the Box Office since Lizzie Banks warned everyone it was going to be feminist because vagina, she then blames the patriarchy for its demise. That kind of attitude will stick with audiences and hopefully the culmination of everything she fought for gets her and such attitudes kicked out of Hollywood. I wonder if she has to pay the money back for this flop..
This guy sounds like he is reviewing a film while trying to poo with a severe case of constipation, it sounds like he's straining really hard the whole time ?🤣🤣 always good videos.
I wonder what other popular 80's tv show or movie will the SJW ruin next?
The problem is that the stereotype they are fighting is not the social view, lol. It's a hollywood thing. In general society females are not "glass ceilinged, helpless, sex pots" only hollywood sees them that way. So in essence they are shoving this " wokeness" at every one except the ppl who perpetuate it, the hollywood film makers.
Its like they forgot that generally half the population are male. Guys have money too u know. They miiight wana pander to guys too when they make their movies😂😂😂 Sure, make a bad movie. But atleast make it bad so both guys n girls can watch it. Alienating half ur market AND make a bad movie... gold mine for youtube channels to tear apart😂😂😂 Truly enjoy these sort of channels these past few years. Keep it up u drunk bastard😂😂😂
nothing wrong with being a feminist, plenty wrong with a “feminist” script whose whole premise at the complete expense of the opposite sex, that wouldn’t be funny the other way round either. It’s just as sexist and unfunny as mocking women.
"Can you imagine the reaction to this movie if the genders were swapped?"Y'mean how they've always been? Heroic men and villainous petty dishonest women?
The "spy thriller" genre ship had set sail a long time ago. Rick and Morty recently set the "heist movie" genre ablaze for many of the same reasons.
Dr Who: hold my babycham.
Why does Kristen Stewart do a somersault backwards when she is beating up the guy in the chair? Also why does he just sit there and not try to get away when Kristen is doing the somersault? Are those curtains that restricting? Stupid!
My real question is how does Kristen Stewart have a Hollywood career at all? Every time I see her she has that same annoyed / blank expression on her face. And, at least by Hollywood standards, she's not particularly standout in the looks department. I can't believe she's still getting roles!
Look up SCTV ... Libby Wolfson ... "I'm taking my own head and screwing it on right .. and no man gonna tell me that it ain't" ... its circa 1980 / 1981 ... its prophetic of 'woke' women in charge of production.
The early 2000's Charlie's Angels was a... 'important' part of my young adult years...
So the new movie are all white female lead character? The original has Asian! This is racist!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I guess I will give you credit for actually going to see this movie. Although you only did it because you wanted to review it for views on your channel. I would not see this movie for any reason. Literally if somebody handed me $50 and said rent it, I am handing them the $50 back. Nothing could get me to see this movie.
Same. And I'm a woman!
If that socialist Steward guy is in the movie, then it's doomed to fail.
I fuckin love this channel
Recipe to lose money : 1) remake and old film 2) put only womens on it 3) make it obviously about gender,woman empowerment some other libertarian lgbt bullshit , blame patriarchy and obviously make the white man the villain 4) insert one black guy/chinese/lesbian/lizard whatever for "diversity" even if there is no reason. 5) lose millions and billions 6)blame audience for racism/homophobia etc when the film obviously fail.
I'm not sure who the intended audience is for this type of female action movie? It's not women.
Geoff Halsey I work part time at a movie theater, and my oh my let me tell you this: Charlie’s Angels was screened at the smallest hall we had, and it was barely half full. After 1 week no sales for that catastrophe....
Also, Kristen Stewart was just NOT believable....she looks like she couldn’t fight her way out of a paper bag. At least the taller girl looks like she could kick some ass if she wanted to. Also, weak villains are boring and they equal weak protaganists
Mark Kermode liked it.... ... ..
Well played, sir. You just earned yourself a new subscriber.
I disagree. The three main characters had a lot of great chemistry together and Kristen Stewart was one of the best things about this movie.